Bug#552632: complete.tcsh bug in postmap

2010-03-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 13/03/10 at 21:17 -0500, Jon Daley wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >What is the rationale for that change? Should we really change something > >that users are probably very much used to? > > Hmm.. I must be missing something. I expect no one is "used to" the > current ali

Bug#552632: complete.tcsh bug in postmap

2010-03-13 Thread Jon Daley
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: What is the rationale for that change? Should we really change something that users are probably very much used to? Hmm.. I must be missing something. I expect no one is "used to" the current alias, since they would currently get the following error

Bug#552632: complete.tcsh bug in postmap

2010-03-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 27/10/09 at 12:12 -0400, Jon Daley wrote: > Package: tcsh > Version: 6.14.00-7 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > please change the postmap complete function to include the trailing slash, > like this: > > complete postmap'n/1/(hash: regexp:)/' 'c/hash:/f/' 'c/regexp:/f/' > > as opp

Bug#552632: complete.tcsh bug in postmap

2009-10-28 Thread Jon Daley
Package: tcsh Version: 6.14.00-7 Severity: minor Tags: patch please change the postmap complete function to include the trailing slash, like this: complete postmap'n/1/(hash: regexp:)/' 'c/hash:/f/' 'c/regexp:/f/' as opposed to the original: complete postmap'n/1/(hash: regexp:)'