Hello!
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 21:37:08 +, b...@bc-bd.org wrote:
> Attached is an updated version of the patch fixing said bash-ism.
I've just uploaded a new version of molly-guard (0.4.5-1); my intention
was to close the release critical bug #548099, so I focused on letting
molly-guard work
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:40:08AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach b...@bc-bd.org [2010.02.03.0021 +1300]:
> > I still think the patch is a valuable addition to molly-guard, as
> > it fixes a problem I and maybe others have. I think that holding
> > this patch back because you feel mol
also sprach b...@bc-bd.org [2010.02.03.0021 +1300]:
> I still think the patch is a valuable addition to molly-guard, as
> it fixes a problem I and maybe others have. I think that holding
> this patch back because you feel molly-guard needs to be rewritten
> is the wrong thing to do.
There is no r
also sprach b...@bc-bd.org [2010.02.03.0021 +1300]:
> As I see it, a Firewall tests for the presence of things (certain
> port, IP, protocol, etc) molly-guard tests for the absence of
> things (ssh ENV, etc).
Molly-guard currently tests to see if it runs remotely. Previously,
this was done with $
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 08:32:20AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach b...@bc-bd.org [2010.02.01.2237 +1300]:
> > Well, this feels to me like trying to prove a negative, which is
> > always hard or impossible.
>
> Actually, I thought that is what we are doing now: the impossible.
>
> Th
also sprach b...@bc-bd.org [2010.02.01.2237 +1300]:
> Well, this feels to me like trying to prove a negative, which is
> always hard or impossible.
Actually, I thought that is what we are doing now: the impossible.
Think about a firewall: there, you'd configure it to REJECT all
packages it does
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 04:49:34PM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> tags 552321 help moreinfo
> thanks
>
> also sprach Stefan Völkel [2009.12.11.0029 +1300]:
> > after playing around with this, it looks like this will only work
> > as long as the screen session has not been detached.
> [???]
> > N
tags 552321 help moreinfo
thanks
also sprach Stefan Völkel [2009.12.11.0029 +1300]:
> after playing around with this, it looks like this will only work
> as long as the screen session has not been detached.
[…]
> Now if you run molly-guard from bash (PID 4986) it will walk up
> the process hierar
Hi,
after playing around with this, it looks like this will only work as
long as the screen session has not been detached.
Before detaching the screen session it looks like this in ps fax:
2580 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd
3568 ?Ss 0:00 \_ sshd: bd [priv]
3570 ?S
9 matches
Mail list logo
