Quoting shirish शिरीष (shirisha...@gmail.com):
> Looking forward to knowing what's happening.
As of last night (european time):
fonts-anonymous-pro_1.002-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi there.
On Jun 18 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting shirish शिरीष (shirisha...@gmail.com):
> > umm any update to regard of this font being packaged for debian ,
> > its been 2 months without any activity or is it in some sort of
> > extended limbo.
> >
> > I did get and read Christi
Quoting shirish शिरीष (shirisha...@gmail.com):
> umm any update to regard of this font being packaged for debian ,
> its been 2 months without any activity or is it in some sort of
> extended limbo.
>
> I did get and read Christian Perrier's response to it
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
In-line :-
2011/4/11 Rogério Brito :
> Hi, All.
Hi,
> Right. That's good to know, Christian. Thanks.
>
> For the people at Canonical/Ubuntu, yes, I have packaged some fonts (like
> what you saw in my blog before), but they were not uploaded before to the
> repository due to two issues:
>
> * W
Quoting Paul Sladen (sla...@canonical.com):
> On 09/04/11 15:04, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>
> Hello Shirish,
>
> Regarding your query about Anonymous Pro, the ITP for Debian is:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551955
>
> which Christian may be able to give you an update on.
5 matches
Mail list logo
