Hi Abou,
I think it's fair to say that the kfreebsd port in Debian are fairly
dead. I wouldn't spend time on solving bugs on that architecture unless
you have personal interest.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi All,
On Sun, 2017-10-01 at 12:30 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > In fastcgi and fcl-web, something goes wrong with linking:
> >ELF interpreter /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
> > I have no idea where this comes from as all references to libexec are
> > either in fpmake itself after co
Hi,
On 15-04-18 12:02, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> It seems that kfreebasd-* resisted to the vague of architectures drop in
> Debian and is still there.
>
> How shall we proceed with this ticket?
I propose we close it and remove any left over patches we have (if any).
We can always resurrect them
It seems that kfreebasd-* resisted to the vague of architectures drop in Debian
and is still there.
How shall we proceed with this ticket?
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: severity -1 normal
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:36:36 +0100 peter green wrote:
> severity: important
> (serious could possiblly be justified depending on how you interpret the
> "reasonablly" in the squeeze rc policy)
I am hearing rumors that kfreebsd-* may be dropped as Debian
architecture.
Hi Peter, Hi Paul
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:29:22 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
...
> Currently I am trying to get fpc building on kfreebsd-amd64 on one of
> the porterboxes. I seem to be able to get a package build, albeit with
> some missing things.Are anybody still interested in this port?
...> In fas
On 25-03-12 00:46, peter green wrote:
> Just to let you know (I should have posted this earlier) I got
> completely lost trying to fixup the assembler init code and gave up on
> my attempts. I may come back to this bug later (right now armhf is more
> important to me than kfreebsd), in the meantime
Just to let you know (I should have posted this earlier) I got
completely lost trying to fixup the assembler init code and gave up on
my attempts. I may come back to this bug later (right now armhf is more
important to me than kfreebsd), in the meantime if anyone else wants to
pick it up i'll p
One thing that I know of is a difference in the name of the function that
returns threadsafe errno.
Yeah I ran into that one, it was pretty trivial to fix though.
It would help to know what symbols are the
problem.
(if they are more libc, or startup code related)
The startup code seems to b
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 01:37 +0100, peter green wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately it seems while the build was sucessful the binary
> > packages are incomplete and unusable. Further research is needed into
> > why things are breaking.
> Ok nailed that issue, it seems that at some point during the buil
In our previous episode, peter green said:
> I've also discovered that grab_vcsa seems to be linux specific so i've
> added fixes to debian/rules to exclude that. Likewise for serveral
> "packages" (in the fpc sense not the debian sense) that don't seem to be
> built when building for freebsd (I d
Unfortunately it seems while the build was sucessful the binary
packages are incomplete and unusable. Further research is needed into
why things are breaking.
Ok nailed that issue, it seems that at some point during the build
process debian/control was regenerated from debian/control.in undo
Hi FPC core,
Can anyone help on this please ?
Note that i've made a fair bit of progress since the mail Abou Al
Montacir forwarded, i'll feedback to the bug with another status update
soon.
I'm also in #fpc on freenode right now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list
Le vendredi 27 mai 2011 à 05:02 +0100, peter green a écrit :
> >
> > Can you please try again with 2.4.4. This includes multiples changes
> > in example script packaging and should fix your issue.
> ok boostrap recipie below (this pretty much represents what I did but
> with some screwups edited
Can you please try again with 2.4.4. This includes multiples changes
in example script packaging and should fix your issue.
ok boostrap recipie below (this pretty much represents what I did but
with some screwups edited out). Note that the instructions below assume
starting in an empty direc
Hi Peter,
Can you please try again with 2.4.4. This includes multiples changes in
example script packaging and should fix your issue.
Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Abou Al Montacir wrote:
Thank you for the interest you are giving to FPC.
Indeed, FPC is supported upstream on *BSD, and we shouldn't get any
issue making it available for Debian for any of these targets.
However a new FPC version (2.4.0) is being released and we should focus
on it instead of 2
Thank you for the interest you are giving to FPC.
Indeed, FPC is supported upstream on *BSD, and we shouldn't get any
issue making it available for Debian for any of these targets.
However a new FPC version (2.4.0) is being released and we should focus
on it instead of 2.2.4. Once it is released,
package: fpc
severity: important
(serious could possiblly be justified depending on how you interpret the
"reasonablly" in the squeeze rc policy)
FPC is supported upstream on freebsd so it stands to reason that it
should also work on debian kfreebsd (thc core rtl of freepascal doesn't
use lib
19 matches
Mail list logo
