On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:13:51AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Yes, that would probably be good. Although that might break installations
> where
> it is already a symlink?
>
> Note that I am currently working on getting Heimdal 1.3.1 for Debian.
Ok, I think I fixed this is Heimdal 1.3.1.dfsg.1-1,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:23:23AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Brian, should I look into making /usr/include/gssapi be a directory of
> symlinks rather than a symlink itself to avoid this?
Yes, that would probably be good. Although that might break installations where
it is already a symlink?
Not
Brian, should I look into making /usr/include/gssapi be a directory of
symlinks rather than a symlink itself to avoid this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
3 matches
Mail list logo
