Hi!
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 18:45:53 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> As mentioned above, I'm looking forward to the inclusion to base
> system of this package, but in the way to achieve this, libbsd0 is not
> priority:important, what's your opinion?
This is the other way around, once you've proposed to mov
Hi Guillem,
I have worked on this package, and plan to upload the new version
soon. It now uses -lbsd and -lresolv, with plenty of bug fixes, etc.
As mentioned above, I'm looking forward to the inclusion to base
system of this package, but in the way to achieve this, libbsd0 is not
priority:impor
Excerpts from Guillem Jover's message of Mon Jan 11 18:00:23 -0500 2010:
> tag 550611 patch
Wonderful, thanks. I'll apply this.
--
things change.
deck...@red-bean.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
tag 550611 patch
thanks
Hi!
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:12:02 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: netcat-openbsd
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please link against libbsd, now that it has been available in stable
> for quite a while, instead of glib.
>
> Some day, libbsd may get upped to important
Package: netcat-openbsd
Severity: wishlist
Please link against libbsd, now that it has been available in stable
for quite a while, instead of glib.
Some day, libbsd may get upped to important (I hope), so that this
can replace netcat-traditional and netcat6 at once. It’s also much
more lightweigh
5 matches
Mail list logo
