Hi,
To Albert Cahalan, I am answering here since that's me that have
introduced the memset patch.
Lundi 23 novembre 2009, vers 10:56:24 (+0100), Albert Cahalan a écrit :
> I don't have this "supgid" in my procps, so I don't have this bug.
The "memset patch" actually addresses two issues.
First
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Craig Small wrote:
> The xcalloc is in the original code, I can even see it in the 3.2.7
> code.
Yeah, I know.
> So is the solution to test the result of the file2str on the status file
> and if that fails set certain pointers to null?
something like that, with
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:56:24AM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> I don't have this "supgid" in my procps, so I don't have this bug.
supgid is a patch to read the supplementary groups. Apparently it can
happen with tasks too.
> I do however have "environ", which readproc sets as follows:
I don't
I don't have this "supgid" in my procps, so I don't have this bug.
I do however have "environ", which readproc sets as follows:
if (unlikely(flags & PROC_FILLENV))
p->environ = file2strvec(path, "environ");
else
p->environ = NULL;
Remember that this is some of the most per
4 matches
Mail list logo
