On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
Ah. Lovely! Well hidden, but then all the more rewarding when found.
I do still think it would be useful to show them in the bug when it is
fully displayed.
They are supposed to be; it's just a small bug that caused them not to
be, which (as I've said),
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote:
> >They're actually in the information for each bug, too. If you click on
> >the [i|N|ÿÿ] bits, you'll see them.
>
> Ah. Lovely! Well hidden, but then all the more rewarding when found.
> I do still think it would be useful to show them in the
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote:
> It's, erm, subtle. Which is fine. I do think it would help to use
> some slightly different formatting of the usertags' text, but
> looking at common.pl:htmlizebugs() I can see that this might be
> difficult to arrange; it's not obvious by tha
They're actually in the information for each bug, too. If you click on
the [i|N|ÿÿ] bits, you'll see them.
Ah. Lovely! Well hidden, but then all the more rewarding when found.
I do still think it would be useful to show them in the bug when it is
fully displayed.
Cheers
Vince
you're more patient than I realised.
One thing I have been trying to figure out is how to get the
usertags defined for a given bug report to be displayed in the
browser.
If you give the user in the users field, they're displayed as if they
were actual tags.
Really? I mean here when I am loo
clone 549439 -1
retitle -1 propogate users= cgi option to further queries in pkgreport.cgi
clone 549439 -2
retitle -2 some include options screw up the summary counts in pkgreport.cgi
thanks
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote:
> sure, I realised I could use that method. However
Thanks for your patient answers.
I am experimenting with pulling out groups of bugs using usertags.
Specifically I was attempting to make some of the urls in [2], that
claim to pull out arch-specific bugs, actually work.
Assuming the architecture specific bits are done by usertags that are
ag
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote:
> I am experimenting with pulling out groups of bugs using usertags.
> Specifically I was attempting to make some of the urls in [2], that
> claim to pull out arch-specific bugs, actually work.
Assuming the architecture specific bits are done b
Thanks for your prompt reply.
Neither of those are valid selection requests, unfortunatly. What
exactly are you trying to do?
I am experimenting with pulling out groups of bugs using usertags.
Specifically I was attempting to make some of the urls in [2],
that claim to pull out arch-specific
retitle 549439 more informative error messages for invalid urls
reassign 549439 debbugs
thanks
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> I was reviewing what passes for documentation on the use of usertags
> [1] to query the bts, via bugs.debian.org/pkgreport.cgi, and started
> experimenting
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
I was reviewing what passes for documentation on the use of usertags [1]
to query the bts, via bugs.debian.org/pkgreport.cgi, and started
experimenting in order to find what does & does not actually work,
inspired by the material in [2].
I put in this
11 matches
Mail list logo
