Please can you guys take this off-list. Thanks.
2010/9/28, Alan BRASLAU :
> On Tuesday 28 September 2010 10:54:26 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Alan BRASLAU (28/09/2010):
>> > I find your use of the word "complaining" disrespectful. A bug
>> > report serves to give feedback, and being polite should
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 10:54:26 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Alan BRASLAU (28/09/2010):
> > I find your use of the word "complaining" disrespectful. A bug
> > report serves to give feedback, and being polite should be answered
> > politely.
>
> Insisting on a particular severity regardless of
Alan BRASLAU (28/09/2010):
> I find your use of the word "complaining" disrespectful. A bug
> report serves to give feedback, and being polite should be answered
> politely.
Insisting on a particular severity regardless of the maintainer's
opinion is disrespectful. (Oh wait, the maintainers are
I find your use of the word "complaining" disrespectful.
A bug report serves to give feedback, and being polite
should be answered politely.
The point is that one cannot have things both ways.
Either kfreebsd is indeed to become core as the announcements
advertise (and I imagine the developers wis
Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
> On Tuesday 06 July 2010 18:49:52 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> If some users consider the use of NFS very important, they can probably
>> help to solve this issue.
>
> They are, by very patiently (and politely) filing bug reports.
> Also by spending time testing.
>
> Not all a
On Tuesday 06 July 2010 18:49:52 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> If some users consider the use of NFS very important, they can probably
> help to solve this issue.
They are, by very patiently (and politely) filing bug reports.
Also by spending time testing.
Not all are programmers, neither having the
Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
> http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20091007
>
> ``
> Debian pushes development of kFreeBSD port
> October 7th, 2009
> The Debian Release Team is pleased to announce that it sees the port of the
> Debian system to the FreeBSD kernel fit to be handled equal with the other
> r
http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20091007
``
Debian pushes development of kFreeBSD port
October 7th, 2009
The Debian Release Team is pleased to announce that it sees the port of the
Debian system to the FreeBSD kernel fit to be handled equal with the other
release ports. The upcoming release code
Jari Aalto (11/04/2010):
> > Petr Salinger writes:
> > severity 549412 important
Yes.
> A missing NFS support is unsuitable for release.
No.
> > serious
> > is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a must or
> > required directive), or, in the package maintainer's
>> Makes the installation unusable in a typical network. E.g. can't mount
>> the /home disk from a remote server.
> Petr Salinger writes:
> severity 549412 important
> thanks
>
> At most important, but may be even just wishlist:
A missing NFS support is unsuitable for release.
> serious
> i
severity 549412 serious
thanks
Makes the installation unusable in a typical network. E.g. can't mount
the /home disk from a remote server.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
found 549412 8.0-10
thanks
> when trying to mount nfs filesystems, it appears to be missing the
> mount_nfs
> command:
>
> mount 127.0.0.1:/opt/ltsp /mnt
> mount: exec mount_nfs not found: No such file or directory
>
Any progress? This also happens in vanilla install of:
http://d-i.de
Package: freebsd-utils
Version: 7.2-8
Severity: normal
when trying to mount nfs filesystems, it appears to be missing the mount_nfs
command:
mount 127.0.0.1:/opt/ltsp /mnt
mount: exec mount_nfs not found: No such file or directory
there appear to be commented out entries in debian/rules, bu
13 matches
Mail list logo
