Bug#548468: gcc-4.4/new eglibc fix

2009-09-29 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Daniel Kobras (kob...@debian.org): > Hi! > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 08:15:59AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Hmmm, I did the last NMU and got no quick reaction from the > > maintainer. > > While indeed I haven't shown much activity within Debian lately, I'm mildly > surprised to re

Bug#548468: gcc-4.4/new eglibc fix

2009-09-28 Thread Daniel Kobras
Hi! On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 08:15:59AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Hmmm, I did the last NMU and got no quick reaction from the > maintainer. While indeed I haven't shown much activity within Debian lately, I'm mildly surprised to receive a complaint about a response time of 2 hours and 39 m

Bug#548468: gcc-4.4/new eglibc fix

2009-09-26 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Stefan Potyra (sistp...@ubuntu.com): > Package: muse > Version: 0.8.1a-6.1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > thanks for maintaining muse. > During Ubunut's rebuild test, muse failed to build from source[1] due to > changed signatures of the c++ string functions in gcc-4.4/new

Bug#548468: gcc-4.4/new eglibc fix

2009-09-26 Thread Stefan Potyra
Package: muse Version: 0.8.1a-6.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, thanks for maintaining muse. During Ubunut's rebuild test, muse failed to build from source[1] due to changed signatures of the c++ string functions in gcc-4.4/new eglibc. Attached is a patch to fix the problem. Cheers, Stef