Dear Sandro,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:00:22PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > I beg to disagree with your reasoning with regard to this paricular
> > bug. In my opinion, this bug _has_ been fixed, and the package is now
> > buildable with Python 2.6. What you refer to is the fact that the
> > pack
Hi Kumar,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 21:41, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Sandro,
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:23:27AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> python.mk is not available in all possible version of debian python
>> package, so you have to use a correct versioned relationship to it.
>
> I beg to
Dear Sandro,
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:23:27AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> python.mk is not available in all possible version of debian python
> package, so you have to use a correct versioned relationship to it.
I beg to disagree with your reasoning with regard to this paricular
bug. In my opin
reopen 547875
thanks
python.mk is not available in all possible version of debian python
package, so you have to use a correct versioned relationship to it.
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroT
4 matches
Mail list logo
