Bug#547743: clamav-unofficial-sigs bashism

2009-09-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 12:43 -0700, Bill Landry wrote: > I'll look into this and see if all "echo" commands I use will map over > cleanly to "printf". I would like to note that out of the many thousands > of people currently using the script, I have not received a single > complaint of my usage of

Bug#547743: clamav-unofficial-sigs bashism

2009-09-28 Thread Bill Landry
Hi Paul, > I received a bug about clamav-unofficial-sigs containing a bashism: > > http://bugs.debian.org/547743 > > Apparently printf should be used instead of echo -e: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh#echo I'll look into this and see if all "echo" commands I use will map over cleanly to

Bug#547743: clamav-unofficial-sigs bashism

2009-09-26 Thread Paul Wise
Hi Bill, I received a bug about clamav-unofficial-sigs containing a bashism: http://bugs.debian.org/547743 Apparently printf should be used instead of echo -e: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh#echo I do wonder why you use \r though, won't that produce a Windows line ending sequence? I'd app