On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> tag 547534 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> I don't see any reason why we would build and *support* a SAPI for a
> proprietary web server while we have other SAPIs that could be enabled for
> free web servers that are packaged in Debian.
As far as i
tag 547534 moreinfo
thanks
On Sunday 20 September 2009 09:51:05 dreamcat four wrote:
> Package: php5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> An excellent replacement for the (now old / ageing) php5-cgi package.
> LiteSpeed SAPI is now officially supported and included from php-5.3.0 and
> greater. So its possibl
Hi,
> An excellent replacement for the (now old / ageing) php5-cgi package.
Eh, replacement which needs (commercial) closed source product?
I don't know what other php maintainers think, but I am not in favor
(in fact I am opposed to) packaging some proprietary SAPI, which you
cannot test withou
3 matches
Mail list logo