Bug#547534: [php-maint] Bug#547534: Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
[Keeping the CC on the canonical folks, although I don't see their relevance on this decision] On Monday 21 September 2009 12:11:41 dreamcat four wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote: [...] > > > None of which is of our interest as the code and the server are in Debi

Bug#547534: [php-maint] Bug#547534: Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-21 Thread dreamcat four
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote: > tag 547534 wontfix > It is called a SAPI for a reason, were they fully compatible they wouldn't be > two different SAPIs. You are wrong here. The php team generally do not want to replace the old fcgi sapi. It would cause too many issues

Bug#547534: [php-maint] Bug#547534: Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
tag 547534 wontfix thanks On Monday 21 September 2009 04:38:24 dreamcat four wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > How? Are there any other free web servers with LiteSpeed interface? > > Quick Google search showed nothing. > > It should be true that any web server who u

Bug#547534: [php-maint] Bug#547534: Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-21 Thread dreamcat four
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > How? Are there any other free web servers with LiteSpeed interface? > Quick Google search showed nothing. It should be true that any web server who understand the Fast-CGI protocol, can communicate with the litespeed PHP sapi. And / or any oth

Bug#547534: [php-maint] Bug#547534: Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 20:16, dreamcat four wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> tag 547534 moreinfo >> thanks >> >> I don't see any reason why we would build and *support* a SAPI for a >> proprietary web server while we have other SAPIs that could be enabled for

Bug#547534: [php-maint] Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-20 Thread dreamcat four
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote: > tag 547534 moreinfo > thanks > > I don't see any reason why we would build and *support* a SAPI for a > proprietary web server while we have other SAPIs that could be enabled for > free web servers that are packaged in Debian. As far as i

Bug#547534: [php-maint] Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-20 Thread Raphael Geissert
tag 547534 moreinfo thanks On Sunday 20 September 2009 09:51:05 dreamcat four wrote: > Package: php5 > Severity: wishlist > > An excellent replacement for the (now old / ageing) php5-cgi package. > LiteSpeed SAPI is now officially supported and included from php-5.3.0 and > greater. So its possibl

Bug#547534: [php-maint] Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-20 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi, > An excellent replacement for the (now old / ageing) php5-cgi package. Eh, replacement which needs (commercial) closed source product? I don't know what other php maintainers think, but I am not in favor (in fact I am opposed to) packaging some proprietary SAPI, which you cannot test withou

Bug#547534: [needs-packaging] php5-litespeed

2009-09-20 Thread dreamcat four
Package: php5 Severity: wishlist An excellent replacement for the (now old / ageing) php5-cgi package. LiteSpeed SAPI is now officially supported and included from php-5.3.0 and greater. So its possible to make a start on this in experimental since we have 5.3.0 in debian/experimental... URL: