El jueves, 24 de septiembre de 2009, azhr...@underhanded.org escribió:
> Initially, there was only an amd64 deb listed in the bug reply, and in
> the archives as well. The x86 version seemed to go up a few days later,
> and all is well.
>
> Thanks! ;)
I'm so sorry for my answer. I under
Initially, there was only an amd64 deb listed in the bug reply, and in
the archives as well. The x86 version seemed to go up a few days later,
and all is well.
Thanks! ;)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 05:22:40PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El viernes, 18 de septiembre de 2009, azhr...@underh
El viernes, 18 de septiembre de 2009, azhr...@underhanded.org escribió:
> Thanks for the quick updates, is there an i686 version on the way as
> well?
I beg you pardon? Why there should be such version of memcached? I
haven't
seen such improvement just by compiling with 686 flags, and
Thanks for the quick updates, is there an i686 version on the way as
well?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
4 matches
Mail list logo
