Bug#544386: anon-proxy: Missing runlevels and dependencies in init.d scripts

2009-10-10 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (p...@hungry.com): > Hi. Any hope of having a fix for this uploaded into unstable soon? > Please object if we should not NMU to fix it. An NMU will be done for l10n purposes (which explains why I'm currently subscribed to the package PTS). I propose including your fix

Bug#544386: anon-proxy: Missing runlevels and dependencies in init.d scripts

2009-10-10 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi. Any hope of having a fix for this uploaded into unstable soon? Please object if we should not NMU to fix it. While reviewing this issue, I notice that the patch is incomplete. To recover systems affected by the incorrect runlevel info in the header, code is needed in the postinst. This patc

Bug#544386: anon-proxy: Missing runlevels and dependencies in init.d scripts

2009-08-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: anon-proxy Version: 00.05.38+20080123-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: incorrect-dependency incorrect-runlevels With dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I believe is a bug in the init.d scripts of thi