Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2011-02-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 542709 - moreinfo # I wish I had an explanation. :) severity 542709 wishlist submitter 542709 ! quit Ximin Luo wrote: > I can no longer reproduce the bug on my git version, 1.7.2.3. I'm lowering the severity since it seems it's unreproducible. > (sorry if you wanted me to test an earlier v

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2011-02-22 Thread Ximin Luo
On 19/02/11 22:54, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Drat. :) > >> I'll try to reproduce this with the latest version of git. > I can no longer reproduce the bug on my git version, 1.7.2.3. > Thanks. The thing to look for is whether "git diff-files" shows > anything after such a conflicted rebase. > >

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2011-02-19 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, Ximin Luo wrote: > I'm pretty sure I was on ext4, my normal > filesystem, with no sshfs or anything like that. Drat. :) > I'll try to reproduce this with the latest version of git. Thanks. The thing to look for is whether "git diff-files" shows anything after such a conflicted rebas

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2011-02-19 Thread Ximin Luo
On 19/02/11 03:09, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > tags 542709 + moreinfo > quit > > Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Ximin Luo wrote: > >>> when a conflict occurs during git-rebase, we are told to fix it, >>> tell git that we have done this with git-add, and then continue the >>> rebase with git rebase --cont

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2011-02-18 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 542709 + moreinfo quit Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ximin Luo wrote: >> when a conflict occurs during git-rebase, we are told to fix it, >> tell git that we have done this with git-add, and then continue the >> rebase with git rebase --continue. both the manual and the program >> say this. >> >>

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2011-02-17 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, Ximin Luo wrote: > when a conflict occurs during git-rebase, we are told to fix it, tell git that > we have done this with git-add, and then continue the rebase with git rebase > --continue. both the manual and the program say this. > > however, this doesn't actually work. I forgot to

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2010-08-19 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 542709 - moreinfo quit Jonathan Nieder wrote: > I’ll try to reproduce this and let you > know when I have more questions. I wasn’t able to reproduce it, unfortunately. I think my random guesses were barking up the wrong tree. :) Worse, the next upload will treat the symptoms, via commit v

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2010-05-17 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Uli Schlachter wrote: > doxygen/manpages/ > doxygen/manpages.cfg > > oflog/include/dcmtk/oflog/config/ > oflog/include/dcmtk/oflog/config.h > > I don't know if any of these were part of the conflict, but this might well be > possible The relevant code in git was recently touched to solve a myst

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2010-05-17 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 16.05.2010 22:58, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > found 542709 git-core/1:1.6.5-1 > quit > > Uli Schlachter wrote: > >> this happened to me the day I wrote the mail to this bug (google found this >> bug >> report while I was looking for a solution). >

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2010-05-16 Thread Jonathan Nieder
found 542709 git-core/1:1.6.5-1 quit Uli Schlachter wrote: > this happened to me the day I wrote the mail to this bug (google found this > bug > report while I was looking for a solution). [...] > /var/log/dpkg.log.3.gz:2010-02-08 15:51:57 status installed git-core > 1:1.6.6.1-1 > /var/log/dpkg

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2010-05-16 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 15.05.2010 21:36, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Uli, do you know whether you were using a release candidate when you > experienced this problem? If you remember when that was, > /var/log/dpkg.log would tell. I am asking because this would confirm > w

Bug#542709: git-core: unexpectedly dirty index after rebase

2010-05-15 Thread Jonathan Nieder
reassign 542709 git git/1:1.6.3.3-2 quit Hi, On 18 November 2009, Uli Schlachter wrote: > I just saw something like this, too. > > After git rebase I got tons of conflicts, I fixed them up and "git add"'ed > each > file, but git rebase --continue just showed me the message the message above. >