Hi Kurt,
On Samstag, 26. Dezember 2009, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I'm not sure why you send this to this bug.
Because I'm stupid / made a mistake. It was ment for 417118... :-/
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:19:13AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> Most services want the time to be more or less correct, for most
> an offset of a few seconds will probably not even be a problem.
> Maybe it would be useful to also have an "event" for that. This
> is something ntpdate can do now,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 09:11:56PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> retitle 542602 "event based boot system needed to solve use cases"
> thanks
>
> pere, isnt #417118 solved by dependency booting?
> h01ger: nope. it is one of the problems that need event based boot to
> work.
> when do you expec
retitle 542602 "event based boot system needed to solve use cases"
thanks
pere, isnt #417118 solved by dependency booting?
h01ger: nope. it is one of the problems that need event based boot to
work.
when do you expect event base booting in debian? IOW: isnt that
something, the user needs to
4 matches
Mail list logo
