Bug#542482: patch proposal

2014-05-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, May 05 2014, Denis Excoffier wrote: >>> However, i would prefer that you remove one of the blank lines >>> *after* this #line directive. That way, the linenum variable >>> is left unchanged. >> >>Could you elaborate? Where is this blank line being emitted? > > Take a flex-2.5.39

Bug#542482: patch proposal

2014-05-05 Thread Denis Excoffier
On 2014-05-04 09:34, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, May 27 2011, Denis Excoffier wrote: > >> On 2010-04-15 00:48, Marcus Rausch wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> how about the patch below? It apparently solves the problem, but I >>> don't know if it has any unwanted side effects. >>> >>> Best regards >

Bug#542482: patch proposal

2014-05-04 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, May 27 2011, Denis Excoffier wrote: > On 2010-04-15 00:48, Marcus Rausch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> how about the patch below? It apparently solves the problem, but I >> don't know if it has any unwanted side effects. >> >> Best regards >> Marcus >> >> >> *** gen.c-old 2007-05-31 08:21:57.

Bug#542482: patch proposal

2011-05-26 Thread Denis Excoffier
On 2010-04-15 00:48, Marcus Rausch wrote: Hi, how about the patch below? It apparently solves the problem, but I don't know if it has any unwanted side effects. Best regards Marcus *** gen.c-old 2007-05-31 08:21:57.0 +0200 --- gen.c 2010-04-14 23:58:47.0 +0200 **

Bug#542482: patch proposal

2010-04-14 Thread Marcus Rausch
Hi, how about the patch below? It apparently solves the problem, but I don't know if it has any unwanted side effects. Best regards Marcus *** gen.c-old 2007-05-31 08:21:57.0 +0200 --- gen.c 2010-04-14 23:58:47.0 +0200 *** *** 2159,2164 --- 2159,2165 --