On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Michael Shutte]
> > Do you think such a mechanism is a good idea (and its implementation
> > feasible) at all? Maybe there are some dangers or serious problems
> > I miss completely.
>
> I'm not sure. I suggest creating a wi
[Michael Schutte]
> The problem you describe only occurs when a user replaces one
> console utility package by the other, and the old package isn't
> purged in this process. Both scripts do pretty much the same thing,
> and they are mutually exclusive, so only one of them will ever be
> executed d
Ahoy Petter!
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 04:37:45PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> With dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I believe is
> a bug in the init.d script. The provides should be unique and
> preferably the name of the script. The current one conflict with the
> conso
Package: kbd
Version: 1.14.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: incorrect-provides incorrect-dependency
With dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I believe is
a bug in the init.d script. The provides should be u
4 matches
Mail list logo
