If you are lazy to reproduce all problems that iceweasel has, close all bugs,
not just this one.
I've provided as much details as I possibly could. I'm not a wireshark expert
to help more. Understand that.
The bug has not been fixed. No clear explanation was provided of why the bug
occurs.
I'
But I'll try the MTU hint as soon as I can, thank you for that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Actually, I've provided all information I could.
I'm absolutely not into wireshark or other network tools of whatever kind,
but, if you are lazy and unable to do that yourself, well, I might do that, but
only starting in late July 2010.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:44:18AM -0400, sasha mal wrote:
> > Pages optimized for IE6 are not necessarily rendered correctly on IE7
> > or IE8.. so much for Microsofts own "standards".
> Man, you still don't get it. MS changed its standard. Standards do change
> over time, that's normal.
>
> >>
> Pages optimized for IE6 are not necessarily rendered correctly on IE7
> or IE8.. so much for Microsofts own "standards".
Man, you still don't get it. MS changed its standard. Standards do change over
time, that's normal.
>> I can help with investigation of wireshark on debian from late July 20
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:39 AM, sasha mal wrote:
>> Repeating this nonsense doesn't make it true.
> You are denying the evident. You have mentioned yourself that a lot of time
> was invested to support IE.
> Since the majority of pages supported IE, it just confirms what I'm saying:
> people tr
> Repeating this nonsense doesn't make it true.
You are denying the evident. You have mentioned yourself that a lot of time was
invested to support IE. Since the majority of pages supported IE, it just
confirms what I'm saying: people try to stick to the standard of IE. In a few
cases even crash
sasha mal schrieb:
There the behavior of IE+Win is, in general, the world standard due to the
major market share. Some behaviors (including bugs, no matter how you defined
them) of IE+Win don't correspond to that of the other browsers. If some
behavior doesn't change in IE+Win for a long perio
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:17:33AM -0400, sasha mal wrote:
> It does, look into the acknowledgements of Safari:
> "Netscape Communications Corporation ( SpiderMonkey, as used in DateMath.cpp
> )..."
Yeah, that has anything to do with networking.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-re
It does, look into the acknowledgements of Safari:
"Netscape Communications Corporation ( SpiderMonkey, as used in DateMath.cpp
)..."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:50:28AM -0400, sasha mal wrote:
> There the behavior of IE+Win is, in general, the world standard due to the
> major market share. Some behaviors (including bugs, no matter how you defined
> them) of IE+Win don't correspond to that of the other browsers. If some
> beha
There the behavior of IE+Win is, in general, the world standard due to the
major market share. Some behaviors (including bugs, no matter how you defined
them) of IE+Win don't correspond to that of the other browsers. If some
behavior doesn't change in IE+Win for a long period of time (which we o
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:51:08PM -0400, sasha mal wrote:
> It's not their page which is broken. Because they have the majority. The
> reality is: if a page can be read by the IE, it's a good page.
> It's the firefox which is broken.
The reality is that a lot of pages are written with IE specifi
It's not their page which is broken. Because they have the majority. The
reality is: if a page can be read by the IE, it's a good page.
It's the firefox which is broken.
> I tried IE6 on Windows 2000 in VirtualBox and the page didn't load.
So what? Windows 2000 is not distributed since 2005. Remn
sasha mal schrieb:
Daniel,
it's great that you are dealing with that.
I've just now tried lynx, firefox, safari on Mac OS X 10.5.8 from the same
network. With the result that
- lynx 2.8.6rel.5 opens both research.microsoft.com and
research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/thoare even when all cook
Daniel,
it's great that you are dealing with that.
I've just now tried lynx, firefox, safari on Mac OS X 10.5.8 from the same
network. With the result that
- lynx 2.8.6rel.5 opens both research.microsoft.com and
research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/thoare even when all cookies are accepted,
an
16 matches
Mail list logo
