Bug#541252: slurm-llnl: Incorrect runlevels and dependencies in init.d LSB header

2009-09-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Gennaro Oliva] > Hi, thanks for your patch it will be included in the next package > release. Great to hear. When do you expect to upload it into unstable? Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Bug#541252: slurm-llnl: Incorrect runlevels and dependencies in init.d LSB header

2009-09-19 Thread gennaro . oliva
Hi, thanks for your patch it will be included in the next package release. -- Gennaro On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:19:06PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Hi. Any hope of having this fixed soon? Let me know if I should not > NMU to get a fix into the archive. > > Note that some code is proba

Bug#541252: slurm-llnl: Incorrect runlevels and dependencies in init.d LSB header

2009-09-18 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi. Any hope of having this fixed soon? Let me know if I should not NMU to get a fix into the archive. Note that some code is probably needed in the postinst to correct runlevel links on existing installations. Something like this from the lprng package would probably work. # Those using dep

Bug#541252: slurm-llnl: Incorrect runlevels and dependencies in init.d LSB header

2009-08-12 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: slurm-llnl slurm-llnl-slurmdbd Version: 2.0.4-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: incorrect-runlevels incorrect-dependency With dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I believe is a bug in the init.d script