# if it's the same bug, merge it; don't just close it.
forcemerge 535888 540611
thanks
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:05:57 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > maybe it's just me, but dealing with issues in multiple releases
> > > with the debian bts is non-obvi
hey michael,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 01:36:31PM -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote:
> >> i guess i'll just deal with the broken system as is...
> >
> > I'm sure Don welcomes constructive criticism ;)
>
> ok, i'll put together a constructive bug report when i have the chance.
you can also reference a
>> i guess i'll just deal with the broken system as is...
>
> I'm sure Don welcomes constructive criticism ;)
ok, i'll put together a constructive bug report when i have the chance.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi,
* Michael S. Gilbert [2009-08-10 19:06]:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:05:57 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > maybe it's just me, but dealing with issues in multiple releases with
> > > the debian bts is non-obvious and a major pain. is the "*right*" way
> > > to do this documented somewhere?
> >
>
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:05:57 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > maybe it's just me, but dealing with issues in multiple releases with
> > the debian bts is non-obvious and a major pain. is the "*right*" way
> > to do this documented somewhere?
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/BugsVersionTracking maybe helps
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:17:44 +0200, sean finney wrote:
> hi michael,
>
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:57:09PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> > maybe it's just me, but dealing with issues in multiple releases with
> > the debian bts is non-obvious and a major pain. is the "*right*" way
> > to do
Hi,
* Michael S. Gilbert [2009-08-10 05:07]:
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:02:36 -0500 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 August 2009 01:13:42 Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> > >
> > > hello, it has been disclosed that php is vulnerable to a buffer
> > > over-read in versions befor 5.2.10. see:
> >
hi michael,
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:57:09PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> maybe it's just me, but dealing with issues in multiple releases with
> the debian bts is non-obvious and a major pain. is the "*right*" way
> to do this documented somewhere?
i've brought this up in the past on -d
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:02:36 -0500 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Sunday 09 August 2009 01:13:42 Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > hello, it has been disclosed that php is vulnerable to a buffer
> > over-read in versions befor 5.2.10. see:
>
> You already reported it as #535888, there's no need to
On Sunday 09 August 2009 01:13:42 Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
>
> hello, it has been disclosed that php is vulnerable to a buffer
> over-read in versions befor 5.2.10. see:
You already reported it as #535888, there's no need to report it more than
once.
And no, reopening the report is *not necessa
package: php5
version: 5.2.0-8+etch13
severity: important
tags: security
hello, it has been disclosed that php is vulnerable to a buffer
over-read in versions befor 5.2.10. see:
http://secunia.com/advisories/35441/
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1632
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
11 matches
Mail list logo
