Bug#537572: Still the same with gnome-settings-daemon 2.30.2-4

2011-08-30 Thread Émeric Maschino
Hi, > FWIW amid the reports merged with this one, there is one person using > i386 and another using mipsel. I don't know for i386 and mipsel, but here are my investigations for ia64. > From the point of view of fixing this in binutils, it would be _very_ > helpful to have a collection of object

Bug#537572: Still the same with gnome-settings-daemon 2.30.2-4

2011-08-27 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Josselin Mouette wrote: > The -z defs flag should not have any impact on the produced binary, it > is a flag to raise errors that we want to report (and we want the build > to fail in this case). > > Hence this is an ia64-specific bug in binutils. FWIW amid the reports merged with this one,

Bug#537572: Still the same with gnome-settings-daemon 2.30.2-4

2011-08-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
reassign 537572 binutils thanks Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 22:42 +0200, Émeric Maschino a écrit : > Hi, > > I've looked at the source package: the debian/build script still > passes -z defs flags to ld, thus producing a broken binary, as > expected :-( The -z defs flag should not have any impact o

Bug#537572: Still the same with gnome-settings-daemon 2.30.2-4

2011-08-18 Thread Émeric Maschino
Hi, I've looked at the source package: the debian/build script still passes -z defs flags to ld, thus producing a broken binary, as expected :-( Regards, Émeric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas