Bug#537271: closed by Matthew Palmer

2011-02-07 Thread Floris Bos
On Monday, February 07, 2011 06:00:40 am Matthew Palmer wrote: > Also, busybox patches should be put into a separate bug report which blocks > this one, to keep things clear. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606654 - Busybox should include arping applet Regarding IPv6: I see th

Bug#537271: closed by Matthew Palmer

2011-02-07 Thread Christian PERRIER
clone 537271 -1 reassign -1 busybox block 537271 by -1 thanks Quoting Matthew Palmer (mpal...@debian.org): > As you have identified: > > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:15:48PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > > (this should probably > > actually be a loop that repeatedly invokes arping with a s

Bug#537271: closed by Matthew Palmer

2011-02-06 Thread Robert Edmonds
Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:15:48PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > > (this should probably > > actually be a loop that repeatedly invokes arping with a short > > timeout in order to update the progress bar.) > > This really needs to be implemented. Leaving users

Bug#537271: closed by Matthew Palmer

2011-02-06 Thread Matthew Palmer
As you have identified: On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:15:48PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > (this should probably > actually be a loop that repeatedly invokes arping with a short > timeout in order to update the progress bar.) This really needs to be implemented. Leaving users hanging

Bug#537271: closed by Matthew Palmer

2011-02-06 Thread Robert Edmonds
tag 537271 +patch thanks Matthew Palmer wrote: > > the simple, 100% effective fix for the > > situation where your port has link up but the bridge port has not > > entered the forwarding state is to send ARP requests for the default > > gateway's IP address until they are answered. an IPv4 router

Bug#537271: closed by Matthew Palmer (This is done, regardless of the reason)

2011-02-06 Thread Matthew Palmer
tag 537271 +help +wontfix # Need a 'cantfix' tag thanks On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:51:06PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Given that there is no possible way to detect that the network link is up > > but unuseable, > > did you even read #537271? No, I find

Bug#537271: closed by Matthew Palmer (This is done, regardless of the reason)

2011-02-06 Thread Robert Edmonds
reopen 537271 thanks Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Given that there is no possible way to detect that the network link is up > but unuseable, did you even read #537271? the simple, 100% effective fix for the situation where your port has link up but the bridge port has not entered the forw