Hi,
I just looked at adopting uuagc. For that, I upgraded uulib (no problem)
and tried to build the newest uuagc package on hackage. It failed at
this point:
[18 of 45] Compiling RhsCheck ( src/RhsCheck.hs,
dist-ghc/build/uuagc/uuagc-tmp/RhsCheck.o )
src/RhsCheck.hs:29:67:
Couldn't
Chris Lamb (08/08/2009):
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
> > build on amd64.
>
> I just tried building a newer upstream verison of uuagc (0.9.10) and
> it built fine using the debian/ directory from 0.9.6-1.
Thanks.
Arjan, any plan to fix this RC bug? Some ar
Lucas Nussbaum wrote;
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
I just tried building a newer upstream verison of uuagc (0.9.10) and it
built fine using the debian/ directory from 0.9.6-1.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'
Package: uuagc
Version: 0.9.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090713 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_te
4 matches
Mail list logo