also sprach Miklos Szeredi [2009.07.16.2203 +0200]:
> It's not as simple as that. NFSv3 is a stateless protocol, it doesn't
> associate state with open files. SFTP on the other hand has stateful
> opens. Yes, we could try to re-open files on reconnection but that
> will not always succeed (perm
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Miklos Szeredi [2009.07.16.2203 +0200]:
> > It's not as simple as that. NFSv3 is a stateless protocol, it doesn't
> > associate state with open files. SFTP on the other hand has stateful
> > opens. Yes, we could try to re-open files on r
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: sshfs
> Version: 2.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It would be nice to have an option like NFS 'hard', which would
> require 'reconnect' and basically causes all filesystem operations
> to block until the connection to the remote is back. Right n
Package: sshfs
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to have an option like NFS 'hard', which would
require 'reconnect' and basically causes all filesystem operations
to block until the connection to the remote is back. Right now, if
a connection is lost and cannot be re-established,
4 matches
Mail list logo