Bug#536104: why: binNMU-unsafe relationships between arch-any and -all packages

2009-07-08 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Mehdi Dogguy a écrit : > > Ideally, we would ask for binNMUs of arch:all packages… I hope this > will be possible in a near future. > Just a follow-up: It seems possible to upload the arch:all package without uploading the arch:any ones. The procedure is described in the link below: ht

Bug#536104: why: binNMU-unsafe relationships between arch-any and -all packages

2009-07-07 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 0, "Aaron M. Ucko" wrote: > > However, that variable is only appropriate for relationships between > architecture-dependent packages; because why-examples and why-coq are > both architecture-independent, binary-only rebuilds (as recently > occurred for the ocaml 3.11.1 transition) render them

Bug#536104: why: binNMU-unsafe relationships between arch-any and -all packages

2009-07-07 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: why Version: 2.18.dfsg-4+b1 Severity: important why uses ${binary:Version} to indicate why-examples's required version of why and why's suggested version of libwhy-coq. However, that variable is only appropriate for relationships between architecture-dependent packages; because why-examp