On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 06:30:11PM -0400, David I. Lehn wrote:
> Here are the two rules I just started using. These messages are of no
> use to me but I have no idea if they are unimportant enough to filter
> out for everyone.
I would tend to agree; these messages indicate that the problem is at
Radek Antoniuk wrote:
> Jul 7 12:54:12 frodo named[12633]: network unreachable resolving
> 'validator.w3.org/A/IN': 2001:500:c::1#53
> Jul 7 12:54:12 frodo named[12633]: connection refused resolving
> 'xklonos.cal.pl/A/IN': 87.98.162.72#53
Here are the two rules I just started using. These m
also sprach Radek Antoniuk [2009.07.07.1328 +0200]:
> Jul 7 12:54:12 frodo named[12633]: network unreachable resolving
> 'www.kurshtml.boo.pl/A/IN': 2001:678:4::2#53
> Jul 7 12:54:12 frodo named[12633]: network unreachable resolving
> 'validator.w3.org/A/IN': 2001:500:e::1#53
> Jul 7 12:54:12
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.69
Severity: wishlist
Jul 7 12:54:12 frodo named[12633]: network unreachable resolving
'www.kurshtml.boo.pl/A/IN': 2001:678:4::2#53
Jul 7 12:54:12 frodo named[12633]: network unreachable resolving
'validator.w3.org/A/IN': 2001:500:e::1#53
Jul 7 12:54:1
4 matches
Mail list logo
