Bug#535993: duplicity handler could use --archive-dir option

2010-03-06 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Olivier Berger wrote (06 Mar 2010 16:43:41 GMT) : > I think that since duplicity 0.6.01, the archive dir use is now > by default. Read, tested and fully agreed. Moreover, according to the manpage, the archive dir is now necessary. > If the goal is to be able to use another dir, then this tic

Bug#535993: duplicity handler could use --archive-dir option

2010-03-06 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:05:20PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > The duplicity handler could use the --archive-dir option, which > would make it run faster as it can use a local set of signatures to > determine which files have changed. > I think that since duplicity 0.6.01, the archive

Bug#535993: duplicity handler could use --archive-dir option

2010-01-05 Thread intrigeri
Hi, martin f krafft wrote (06 Jul 2009 17:05:20 GMT) : > The duplicity handler could use the --archive-dir option, which > would make it run faster as it can use a local set of signatures to > determine which files have changed. Right. Preliminary patches have been submitted long ago on the backu

Bug#535993: duplicity handler could use --archive-dir option

2009-07-06 Thread martin f krafft
Package: backupninja Version: 0.9.6-4 Severity: wishlist The duplicity handler could use the --archive-dir option, which would make it run faster as it can use a local set of signatures to determine which files have changed. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstabl