On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:21, ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org said:
> There is diffrence between the proposed patch and SVN head, is it
> signigicant?
That is just white space and should not make any difference. Right, the
last line should not be followed by a tab, OTOH the first line should
start with
On 2009-07-02 Werner Koch wrote:
> Incidentally I commited that fix a few minutes ago to the upstream SVN.
> It was lingering around in my working copy for a couple of days. No
> plans for a new libgcrypt 1.4 release, though.
Thanks for following the bts.
There is diffrence between the proposed
Incidentally I commited that fix a few minutes ago to the upstream SVN.
It was lingering around in my working copy for a couple of days. No
plans for a new libgcrypt 1.4 release, though.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
--
To UNSUB
Package: libgcrypt11
Version: 1.4.4-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch karmic
Two Ubuntu users reported that libgcrypt11 fails stack-smashing
detection on VIA systems (we use -fstack-protector by default):
https://bugs.launchp
4 matches
Mail list logo
