Bug#535162: patch

2009-12-27 Thread Norbert Preining
On Sa, 26 Dez 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > strange. Maybe I had still the old package, or the quilt 3.0 format > > built in a cowbuilder did somehow not apply the patches ... > > I tend to believe so because the patch, even if it did not exploit all > the optimizations suggested by Olly, sh

Bug#535162: patch

2009-12-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:28:49PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hmm, on a second run it was much faster and ended with > * cleaning up database..1034 messages cleaned up > ... > strange. Maybe I had still the old package, or the quilt 3.0 format > built in a cowbuilder did some

Bug#535162: patch

2009-12-26 Thread Norbert Preining
On So, 27 Dez 2009, prein...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at wrote: > and that already since more than 10min :-( Hmm, on a second run it was much faster and ended with * cleaning up database..1034 messages cleaned up ... strange. Maybe I had still the old package, or the quilt 3.0 fo

Bug#535162: patch

2009-12-26 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Stefano, first of all thanks for the patch and follow up on the issues page of mu. On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Sorry for the delay, here is a first stab at the patch. The overall > result is shown by the simple test below, deleting 2.3K messages has > been re-indexed in a

Bug#535162: patch

2009-12-21 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
tags 535162 + patch thanks On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:54:17PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > On So, 01 Nov 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Thanks a lot also for the extra investigation, I'll try to mock up a > > patch for both issues. > > Would be great, I don't have much time ATM. I moved