Bug#534474: Recent change broke my mailboxes configuration

2009-08-19 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Hi Antonio, On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 22:15:20 +0100, Antonio Radici wrote: > I had a conversation [0] with the mutt developers and it seems that this > configuration is unsupported and the fact that it was working before was > unintended. > So, do you want me to pursue this thing further? Thank y

Bug#534474: Recent change broke my mailboxes configuration

2009-08-17 Thread Antonio Radici
tag 534474 +wontfix thanks Hi, I had a conversation [0] with the mutt developers and it seems that this configuration is unsupported and the fact that it was working before was unintended. It seems that mutt-dev didn't intend backticks for expansion on multiple lines, you can have a look at Rocco

Bug#534474: Recent change broke my mailboxes configuration

2009-08-14 Thread Antonio Radici
tag 534474 +fixed-upstream thanks On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:28:17PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > The issue is reproducible for me with upstream mercurial HEAD using the > reproducer I provided previously, but not with revision fa4990c5b5c6 (which > corresponds to mutt-1.5.18). Bisection le

Bug#534474: Recent change broke my mailboxes configuration

2009-08-05 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
# Reproducer was supplied back in June tags 534474 - moreinfo - unreproducible # See below tags 534474 + upstream thanks The issue is reproducible for me with upstream mercurial HEAD using the reproducer I provided previously, but not with revision fa4990c5b5c6 (which corresponds to mutt-1.5.18).

Bug#534474: Recent change broke my mailboxes configuration

2009-06-28 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Hi Antonio, On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 21:03:08 +0200, Antonio Radici wrote: > If you can reproduce it against a 1.5.18-6 and an 1.5.20-1 (with different > behaviors) can you please attach two .muttdebug0 files (one per version) > (generated with mutt -d5) that contains some hits of '$' when you are

Bug#534474: Recent change broke my mailboxes configuration

2009-06-24 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Hi Antonio, On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 21:03:08 +0200, Antonio Radici wrote: > thanks for your bug report; first of all: are you using maildirs or > mboxes I'm using maildirs. > Then, are you sure that that mailboxes setting works on 1.5.18-6? Yes, I am. When I have 1.5.18-6+b1 installed, the sett

Bug#534474: Recent change broke my mailboxes configuration

2009-06-24 Thread Antonio Radici
tag 534474 +moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 07:10:59PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > How am I trying to do it: > > Using the "mailboxes" command with backtick substitution in my ~/.muttrc. > > What behaviour did I expect: > > When I have > mailboxes `echo '=fo

Bug#534474: Recent change broke my mailboxes configuration

2009-06-24 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Package: mutt Version: 1.5.20-1 Severity: important What am I trying to do: Have mutt check for new mail in a list of mailboxes that is dynamically generated. How am I trying to do it: Using the "mailboxes" command with backtick substitution in my ~/.muttrc. What behaviour did I expect: When