On 09/07/09 at 11:41 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 08/07/09 at 22:57 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> >> Hi Lucas,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your work. But the alternative to libboost1.37-dev:
> >> libboost-dev is available since May, so it should have been available
> >> dur
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:41:02AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Alternatives in build-dependencies are not supported by sbuild,
>
> Use the -C switch. Further this behavior is violating the Debian Policy
> section
> 7.1. You might file a bug report with severity "normal", but not a serio
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/07/09 at 22:57 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>> Hi Lucas,
>>
>> Thanks for your work. But the alternative to libboost1.37-dev:
>> libboost-dev is available since May, so it should have been available
>> during your rebuild in June too. I don't know, why the package fail
reopen 534082
thanks
On 08/07/09 at 22:57 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Thanks for your work. But the alternative to libboost1.37-dev:
> libboost-dev is available since May, so it should have been available
> during your rebuild in June too. I don't know, why the package failed to
Package: openbabel
Version: 2.2.1-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by p
5 matches
Mail list logo
