Bug#534078: oaklisp: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: oaklisp

2009-10-02 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
severity 534078 normal retitle should not be built on archs other than i386 thanks On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 01:43:49PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > Darn straight: oaklisp is (at the moment) 32-bit only. A 64-bit port > would be a major upstream undertaking. Diminishing the severity then,

Bug#534078: oaklisp: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: oaklisp

2009-07-05 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Darn straight: oaklisp is (at the moment) 32-bit only. A 64-bit port would be a major upstream undertaking. --Barak. -- Barak A. Pearlmutter Hamilton Institute & Dept Comp Sci, NUI Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland http://www.bcl.hamilton.ie/~barak/ -- T

Bug#534078: oaklisp: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: oaklisp

2009-06-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: oaklisp Version: 1.3.3-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ** Using build dependencies supplied by pac