On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:41:35 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> I couldn't find any announcement of such announcement on RedHat/Google.
> Do you have some pointer?
i was mistaken, it was the FSA that i was referring to (i tend to
equate redhat and fedora). there have been no updates to redhat-propper
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 13:29 -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:15:16 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> > I have analyzed the code, and made some test. It seems that there is no
> > such "ACL vulnerability". Actually it doesn't even seems to be a bug:
> > The developers seems to
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:15:16 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> I have analyzed the code, and made some test. It seems that there is no
> such "ACL vulnerability". Actually it doesn't even seems to be a bug:
> The developers seems to have decided to change the behavior of ACLs in
> moinmoin:
redhat di
severity 533673 normal
thanks
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 14:00 -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
>
> moin in stable/oldstable has a heirarchical ACL vulnerability. this
> is fixed in upstream 1.8.4, which is already in unstable. see [1].
> please coordinate fixes with the security team.
I have analy
4 matches
Mail list logo
