Hi,
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> I've more info. The problem is that there should be a link named
> "basis-link" in /usr/lib/openoffice, but in my system there is one
> directory with that name. After purging openoffice.org, this directory
You have a *directory* as basis-link?
That explains why it
I've more info. The problem is that there should be a link named
"basis-link" in /usr/lib/openoffice, but in my system there is one
directory with that name. After purging openoffice.org, this directory
is not deleted and it contains the file
/usr/lib/openoffice/basis-link/share/config/javasettings
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> it's just the usual boring i386 arch, Debian GNU/Linux system working
> great for years with a normal Debian testing mixed with some bits from
> unstable... don't ask me which ones because apt did the job, but I'd
> see if you need it.
And who says that is a sensible thi
sorry, I ran reportbug in my laptop, the mail bounced because I wasn't
at work and then I did cut-and-paste but it seems I forgot some
important bits from the original report. I think you'd be happier with
that...
it's just the usual boring i386 arch, Debian GNU/Linux system working
great for year
tag 531750 + moreinfo
tag 531750 + unreproducible
thanks
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> After upgrading the system, so ooffice has been upgraded from 2.4 to 3.0,
How did you upgrade? What did you upgrade? In what distro? Which packages
of OOo did you have installed *when the bug occured*? "Of course"
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.0.1-9
Severity: normal
After upgrading the system, so ooffice has been upgraded from 2.4 to 3.0,
it does not even start:
$ openoffice.org
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 213:
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/pagein: No such file or
d
6 matches
Mail list logo
