On Saturday 06 June 2009, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > E: Invalid operation autoremove
>
> Do we still really need etch support?
We need etch support until the security support for etch has stopped.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Saturday 06 June 2009 05:25:43 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> At Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:34:19 +0200,
> > E: Invalid operation autoremove
>
> Do we still really need etch support?
I know I do :) The company I work for still has a large number of etch servers
in the field, for which we need to build packa
At Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:34:19 +0200,
Nicolas Noirbent wrote:
>
> Package: pbuilder
> Version: 0.187
> Severity: important
> Package: pbuilder
> Version: 0.188
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the addition of 'apt-get autoremove' on upgrades (git commit
> ba35d786b9ebb80ffa3722fed381
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.187
Severity: important
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nicolas Noirbent
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: pbuilder 0.188 breaks --update in etch chroots
Message-ID: <20090601162909.15359.252
4 matches
Mail list logo