Nick Ellery a écrit :
Ah, I didn't realize this. Does making the change you made do the same thing?
Nope - the webhttrack script change is safe (except if one day there is
another "abrowser" binary which is not a browser on Debian - the odds
are quite low)
Until the control file can be "mu
Nick Ellery a écrit :
Thanks for making this change. You'll need to update debian/control
too, and add an alternative dependency on abroswer as well.
Err, AFAIK there is no aborowser in the Debian repository -- introducing
a dependency (even optional) over a non-existing package would probabl
Ah, I didn't realize this. Does making the change you made do the same thing?
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Nick Ellery a écrit :
>>
>> Thanks for making this change. You'll need to update debian/control
>> too, and add an alternative dependency on abroswer as well.
>
Thanks for making this change. You'll need to update debian/control
too, and add an alternative dependency on abroswer as well.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Xavier Roche wrote:
> severity 530031 wishlist
> tag 530031 +pending
> tag 530031 +patch
> thanks
>
> Nick Ellery a écrit :
>>
>> Ubunt
severity 530031 wishlist
tag 530031 +pending
tag 530031 +patch
thanks
Nick Ellery a écrit :
Ubuntu currently alternatively depends on abrowser for the webhttrack
package, alongside the other browsers. It would benefit greatly if
abrowser was added as an alternative depend for webhttrack.
This
Package: httrack
Hi,
Ubuntu currently alternatively depends on abrowser for the webhttrack
package, alongside the other browsers. It would benefit greatly if
abrowser was added as an alternative depend for webhttrack.
Thanks,
Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.d
6 matches
Mail list logo
