On Fri,07.Aug.09, 00:17:04, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > > it's hard to reproduce since, immediately after a reboot it
> > > > always works. The system has to stay on for a while before the
> > > > shutdown
> > > > will fail. Any ideas on how to diagnose this?
> > >
> > > Not really sure. May
On jeu, 2009-08-06 at 17:06 -0400, Pascal Gervais wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:52:12 +0200
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> > On jeu, 2009-08-06 at 21:27 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > Sorry for the late reply, but wanted to gather more data.
> > >
> > > The shutdown worked for a while, but
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:52:12 +0200
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On jeu, 2009-08-06 at 21:27 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Sorry for the late reply, but wanted to gather more data.
> >
> > The shutdown worked for a while, but then it broke again.
> > Unfortunately
> > it's hard to reproduce sin
On jeu, 2009-08-06 at 21:27 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, but wanted to gather more data.
>
> The shutdown worked for a while, but then it broke again.
> Unfortunately
> it's hard to reproduce since, immediately after a reboot it always
> works. The system has to stay
On Thu,16.Jul.09, 08:04:31, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually, I don't get a working shutdown with gdm and
> > > > > libpam-ck-connector installed.
> > > >
> > > > That's definitely a bug. Check you didn't mess with your PolicyKit.conf,
> > > > and check what you have in pol
On dim, 2009-05-03 at 09:17 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed,29.Apr.09, 11:49:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Wed,29.Apr.09, 08:35:18, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On mer, 2009-04-29 at 09:11 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > > > From a display manager, /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90consolekit wil
On Wed,29.Apr.09, 11:49:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed,29.Apr.09, 08:35:18, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mer, 2009-04-29 at 09:11 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > > From a display manager, /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90consolekit will always be
> > > > run, and position correctly the ck stuff. Thi
On Wed,29.Apr.09, 08:35:18, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer, 2009-04-29 at 09:11 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > From a display manager, /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90consolekit will always be
> > > run, and position correctly the ck stuff. This is the simple case :)
> >
> > Actually, I don't get a w
On mer, 2009-04-29 at 09:11 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > From a display manager, /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90consolekit will always be
> > run, and position correctly the ck stuff. This is the simple case :)
>
> Actually, I don't get a working shutdown with gdm and
> libpam-ck-connector installed.
On Tue,28.Apr.09, 22:29:04, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Ok, I've run some tests and asked Julien Cristau about startx behavior.
>
> Basically, if we want a “fully loaded” Xfce session, with complete user
> experience, we need to be able to shutdown through hal, and to
> mount/umount devices easily.
On mer, 2009-04-29 at 00:50 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 23:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Ok. I've tested and we have indeed propagation problems. I'm not sure
> > how it's supposed to be handled, but I think it's a bug in consolekit. I
> > don't exactly know how it s
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 23:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Ok. I've tested and we have indeed propagation problems. I'm not sure
> how it's supposed to be handled, but I think it's a bug in consolekit. I
> don't exactly know how it should be done, but:
>
> - either the authentication propagates
On 04/28/09 15:47, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Ok. I've tested and we have indeed propagation problems. I'm not sure
how it's supposed to be handled, but I think it's a bug in consolekit. I
don't exactly know how it should be done, but:
- either the authentication propagates from console to X
- eit
On mar, 2009-04-28 at 14:56 -0600, Scott Barker wrote:
> On 04/28/09 14:29, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > If it's installed, consolekit stuff will be positionned at login, and
> > should be propagated to any desktop run from there. And that's why
> > 90consolekit should _not_ be run, and why the pam
On mar, 2009-04-28 at 14:56 -0600, Scott Barker wrote:
> On 04/28/09 14:29, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > From a display manager, /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90consolekit will always be
> > run, and position correctly the ck stuff. This is the simple case :)
> >
> > From the console:
> > - either libpam-ck
On 04/28/09 15:15, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar, 2009-04-28 at 14:56 -0600, Scott Barker wrote:
On 04/28/09 14:29, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
But we have a problem with 2a because in some cases which you exposed in
I don't remember which bug, that the ck session on console wasn't
propagated to
On 04/28/09 14:29, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
From a display manager, /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90consolekit will always be
run, and position correctly the ck stuff. This is the simple case :)
From the console:
- either libpam-ck-connector is installed
- either it's not
If it's installed, consolekit st
Ok, I've run some tests and asked Julien Cristau about startx behavior.
Basically, if we want a “fully loaded” Xfce session, with complete user
experience, we need to be able to shutdown through hal, and to
mount/umount devices easily. For that, we need access to hal, and so we
need policykit perm
18 matches
Mail list logo
