Bug#525915: Patch

2009-04-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Jonny Lamb wrote: > short, this will be exclusive to GLib. I can even say that this will > be exclusive to gobject. Oh, I misunderstood it then. Thanks for the explanation. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#525915: Patch

2009-04-28 Thread Jonny Lamb
On Tue, Apr 28, 09:35:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Jonny Lamb wrote: > I think you should rather file a bug on lintian, as that seems to be the > standard location for refdbg and won't be exclusive to GLib There is no "standard location" for refdbg. /usr/lib/refdbg was created for exa

Bug#525915: Patch

2009-04-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 28 avril 2009 à 09:35 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > Jonny Lamb wrote: > > So, I've attached an initial patch to add this package. The patch adds > > the following lintian error: > > > > E: libglib2.0-0-refdbg: unstripped-binary-or-object > > ./usr/lib/refdbg/libgobject-2.0.so.

Bug#525915: Patch

2009-04-28 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Jonny Lamb wrote: > So, I've attached an initial patch to add this package. The patch adds > the following lintian error: > > E: libglib2.0-0-refdbg: unstripped-binary-or-object > ./usr/lib/refdbg/libgobject-2.0.so.0.2000.1 > > I guess we should override it, right? I think you should rather file

Bug#525915: Patch

2009-04-27 Thread Jonny Lamb
tags 525915 + patch kthxbye So, I've attached an initial patch to add this package. The patch adds the following lintian error: E: libglib2.0-0-refdbg: unstripped-binary-or-object ./usr/lib/refdbg/libgobject-2.0.so.0.2000.1 I guess we should override it, right? The other thing I'm not sure abou