On Apr 18, "B. L. Jilek" wrote:
> and there are no *.rules files in the new package (udev_0.140-2_amd64.deb).
Check /lib/udev/rules.d/.
Anyway, downgrading udev has a very high probability to broke your system.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Apr 16, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Marco, if this is not a udev bug, please reassign it to the proper
> > > package, but dont make users workaround you. Also note that 524276
> > > is about ud
an.org with problems
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)
> To: Holger Levsen
> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:11:58 +0200
> Subject: Re: Bug#524286: general: kernel modules does not automatically
> load
> On Apr 16, Holger L
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 16, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Marco, if this is not a udev bug, please reassign it to the proper
> > package, but dont make users workaround you. Also note that 524276
> > is about udev in stable, which is not etch anymore.
>
> I have no reason to b
reassign 524286 udev
thanks
On Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, Luca Boncompagni wrote:
> Package: general
> I try to open this as and udev bug (#524276) but Marco closed it because he
> think that this is not an udev bug.
I'm speechless. (About users filing bugs against the wrong package because the
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 01:04 +0200, Luca Boncompagni wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
> I try to open this as and udev bug (#524276) but Marco closed it because he
> think that this is not an udev bug.
>
> Yesterday, after upgarding my system (aptitude update && aptitude
> sa
Package: general
Severity: normal
Hi,
I try to open this as and udev bug (#524276) but Marco closed it because he
think that this is not an udev bug.
Yesterday, after upgarding my system (aptitude update && aptitude safe-upgrade
&& aptitude clean), when I restarted the system I was not able to
7 matches
Mail list logo