On 07/04/09 at 23:44 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:59:00PM -0700]:
> > On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
> > > important for jruby...
> >
> > to have 2 versions of jruby available
Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:17:09PM -0700]:
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
> > both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
> > still be needed ?
>
> As I said in my other mail, f
Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:59:00PM -0700]:
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
> > important for jruby...
>
> to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
> instance, try the new
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:17:09PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
> > both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
> > still be needed ?
>
> As I said in my other mail
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
> both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
> still be needed ?
As I said in my other mail, for transition reasons;
backward-compatibility is something many people like t
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:40:54PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> On Apr/07, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or
> > jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three
> > different versions in the archive instead of
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
> important for jruby...
to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
instance, try the new one on your existing jruby code without removing
the old one, for instance ?
+ Sebastien Delafond (Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:08:17 -0700):
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
> so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
> system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?
The question was, rather: why would
On Apr/07, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or
> jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three
> different versions in the archive instead of one, or two at most?
jruby1.0 will indeed be removed shortly from the arch
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sebastien Delafond
>
>
>
> * Package name: jruby1.2
> Version : 1.2.0
> Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
> * URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond
* Package name: jruby1.2
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
* License : tri-license CPL/GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : 100% pure
12 matches
Mail list logo
