Bug#522432: Not reproducible

2009-04-29 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On 30 Apr 2009, at 02:21, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:38:38 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: Sorry, but I don't understand why a Depends: on binutils is insufficient in this case. Because libbfd doesn't have a stable ABI, and its SONAME changes with every binutils rel

Bug#522432: Not reproducible

2009-04-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:38:38 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Sorry, but I don't understand why a Depends: on binutils is insufficient > in this case. > Because libbfd doesn't have a stable ABI, and its SONAME changes with every binutils release, so having any version of binutils installed

Bug#522432: Not reproducible

2009-04-29 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Sorry, but I don't understand why a Depends: on binutils is insufficient in this case. If it was not present on the system, then there was a problem with the local configuration: eg. 'dpkg --force-all' to force installation despite missing files; files deliberately 'rm'd', etc. ggcov had

Bug#522432: Not reproducible

2009-04-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 20:37:23 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Package: ggcov > Version: 0.8-7 > > Closing this bug as it is not reproducible. > ggcov depends on binutils, which contains libbfd. ggcov now uses the > latest binutils : > > coll:ggcov-0.8$ ldd /usr/bin/ggcov | grep bfd >