retitle 521547 incrementally assemble arrays as components become available
severity 521547 wishlist
tags 521547 = confirmed help
thanks
> Almost everything can be converted to an asynchronous model where
> the second part of the code is started by an udev RUN rule, which
> guarantees the existenc
On Mar 29, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Marco d'Itri [2009.03.28.1904 +0100]:
> > > Just for my curiosity... does this statement belong to `udevsettle' only
> > > or to `udevadm settle' as well?
> > It's the same thing.
> So how should we wait for udev to complete what it's doing?
Almost
also sprach Marco d'Itri [2009.03.28.1904 +0100]:
> > Just for my curiosity... does this statement belong to `udevsettle' only
> > or to `udevadm settle' as well?
> It's the same thing.
So how should we wait for udev to complete what it's doing?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sent
On Mar 28, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Just for my curiosity... does this statement belong to `udevsettle' only
> or to `udevadm settle' as well?
It's the same thing.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:17:15PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Packages which use udevsettle are broken by design anyway.
Just for my curiosity... does this statement belong to `udevsettle' only
or to `udevadm settle' as well?
Mario
--
There are trivial truths and the great truths.
The opposit
reassign 521547 mdadm
clone 521547 -1
reassign -1 cryptsetup
close 521547 -2
reassign -2 lirc
thanks
On Mar 28, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> udev does not ship the /sbin/udevsettle symlink anymore. Since the
> Debian ChangeLog doesn't state any change regarding this, I'm not sure
> whether t
Package: udev
Version: 0.140-1
Hello,
udev does not ship the /sbin/udevsettle symlink anymore. Since the
Debian ChangeLog doesn't state any change regarding this, I'm not sure
whether this is intentional or not.
If you think this is intentional, please reassign/clone this bug to
mdadm, cryptsetup
7 matches
Mail list logo
