On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I have rescheduled it to 5 days (+4). Please test the new package in the mean
>> time.
>
> I have not tested it, but do consider your approach to be an
> improvement, Odyx. Since you have already offered to defend it for the
> Release Tea
First of all, thanks to *both* og you for caring about this issue.
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2012-11-26 09:42:02)
> Le dimanche, 25 novembre 2012 19.15:39, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> > I personally prefer the one-line fix for wheezy due to simplicity.
> > I think the "nice" but large fix sh
Hi Michael,
thanks for your feedback.
Le dimanche, 25 novembre 2012 19.15:39, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> I personally prefer the one-line fix for wheezy due to simplicity. I
> think the "nice" but large fix should wait till jessie.
I very much disagree here. Let me explain why: first, if look
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Didier Raboud wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for ghostscript (versioned as 9.05~dfsg-6.3) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
I personally prefer the one-line fix for wheezy due to simplicity. I
think the "nic
tags 520753 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ghostscript (versioned as 9.05~dfsg-6.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru ghostscript-9.05~dfsg/debian/changelog ghostscript-9.05~dfsg/debian/changelog
5 matches
Mail list logo
