Bug#520680: libc6-dbg: Debug symbols not broken up by runtime package

2009-04-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:10:02AM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Yes, debugging packages in Debian are all using the same layout: one per > > source package. A lot of them are a lot bigger than libc6-dbg. > > > >> Wouldn't it be better

Bug#520680: libc6-dbg: Debug symbols not broken up by runtime package

2009-04-25 Thread Samuel Bronson
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Yes, debugging packages in Debian are all using the same layout: one per > source package. A lot of them are a lot bigger than libc6-dbg. > >> Wouldn't it be better to split the symbols for libc6-foo into a >> seperate -foo-dbg package? > >

Bug#520680: libc6-dbg: Debug symbols not broken up by runtime package

2009-04-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
severity 520680 wishlist tag 520680 + wontfix thanks On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 05:33:44PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote: > Package: libc6-dbg > Version: 2.7-15 > Severity: normal > > It looks like the symbols for all three of libc6, libc6-amd64, and > libc6-i686 are included in this package. Combined

Bug#520680: libc6-dbg: Debug symbols not broken up by runtime package

2009-03-21 Thread Samuel Bronson
Package: libc6-dbg Version: 2.7-15 Severity: normal It looks like the symbols for all three of libc6, libc6-amd64, and libc6-i686 are included in this package. Combined with the fixing of #516516, this results (well, will result, for me) in a quite large package, parts of which may be quite useles