Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Luk Claes | 2009-03-25 19:17:57 [+0100]: >Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 09:45 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >>> The problem here is that it is not just a library. libkatze itself is a >>> .a static library which is merged into midori and this is fine. But it >>> is als

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Trent W. Buck | 2009-03-25 20:10:22 [+1100]: >On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:29:56AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> >+ CFLAGS="-fPIC" ./waf --nocache configure --prefix=/usr >> this is not cool because now -fPIC is also used for midori binary >> itself. > >Please help me to understand

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Luk Claes | 2009-03-25 19:17:57 [+0100]: >Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 09:45 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >>> The problem here is that it is not just a library. libkatze itself is a >>> .a static library which is merged into midori and this is fine. But it >>> is als

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Luk Claes
Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 09:45 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> The problem here is that it is not just a library. libkatze itself is a >> .a static library which is merged into midori and this is fine. But it >> is also merged into a few add-ons which are .so and tha

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 09:45 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > The problem here is that it is not just a library. libkatze itself is a > .a static library which is merged into midori and this is fine. But it > is also merged into a few add-ons which are .so and that's where you > need the -f

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:45:34AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >kalikiana> I also have a reason to not use it actually, which is that > >kalikiana> for instance on x86-32 it makes the application slower. > > > >twb> OK, Debian says that reason is not good enough for Debian. > >twb> ht

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:29:56AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >+CFLAGS="-fPIC" ./waf --nocache configure --prefix=/usr > this is not cool because now -fPIC is also used for midori binary > itself. Please help me to understand why it's bad to use -fPIC for the binary itself. > S

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Trent W. Buck | 2009-03-21 21:38:14 [+1100]: >>From IRC: > >kalikiana> Regarding -fPIC, I don't really see how I could avoid it. >kalikiana> If somebody finds it wrong, I would really like to know an >kalikiana> alternative because it is needed for linking extensions. > >twb> I looked at the Deb

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-25 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* dann frazier | 2009-03-17 18:57:24 [-0600]: >I tested the initial patch on paer.debian.org, a parisc machine. oh. why that? Could please post a build log? -fPIC has to fix the issues. It is possible that I forgot it somewhere. >I found that it didn't work. However, this one did: > >--- midori-0

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-21 Thread Trent W. Buck
>From IRC: kalikiana> Regarding -fPIC, I don't really see how I could avoid it. kalikiana> If somebody finds it wrong, I would really like to know an kalikiana> alternative because it is needed for linking extensions. twb> I looked at the Debian Policy manual again, and it says -fPIC twb> *must*

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-17 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:27:33PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:49:49PM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:57:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: >>> I tested the initial patch on paer.debian.org, a parisc machine. >>> I found that it didn't work. Howev

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-17 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:49:49PM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:57:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > I tested the initial patch on paer.debian.org, a parisc machine. > > I found that it didn't work. However, this one did: > > > > - ./waf --nocache configure --prefix=

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-17 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:57:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > I tested the initial patch on paer.debian.org, a parisc machine. > I found that it didn't work. However, this one did: > > - ./waf --nocache configure --prefix=/usr > + CFLAGS="-fPIC" ./waf --nocache configure --prefix=/usr Ye

Bug#518281: patch insufficient

2009-03-17 Thread dann frazier
I tested the initial patch on paer.debian.org, a parisc machine. I found that it didn't work. However, this one did: --- midori-0.1.4/debian/rules.orig 2009-03-18 00:47:05.0 + +++ midori-0.1.4/debian/rules 2009-03-18 00:45:01.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ build: dh