On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 13:32, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 15 Oct 2009, at 06:08, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>> A bug is already filed (and it's in CC now); should I file *another*
>> bug to ask an upload? Weird.
>
> Yeah, I just realised this. Maybe you should ping Piotr Ozarowski about it?
>
>> Do you p
On 15 Oct 2009, at 06:08, Sandro Tosi wrote:
A bug is already filed (and it's in CC now); should I file *another*
bug to ask an upload? Weird.
Yeah, I just realised this. Maybe you should ping Piotr Ozarowski
about it?
Do you prefer a NMU?
I don't mind, because I am not actively mainta
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:18, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Do you plan an upload soon of phenny? The bug should be already fixed
>> in the VCS repo, so an upload would be very welcome.
>
> Nope! The package is team maintained now. Just file a bug? Thanks!
Even better: the package IS NOT team-maintain
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:18, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Do you plan an upload soon of phenny? The bug should be already fixed
>> in the VCS repo, so an upload would be very welcome.
>
> Nope! The package is team maintained now. Just file a bug? Thanks!
A bug is already filed (and it's in CC now);
Do you plan an upload soon of phenny? The bug should be already fixed
in the VCS repo, so an upload would be very welcome.
Nope! The package is team maintained now. Just file a bug? Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hi Noah,
Do you plan an upload soon of phenny? The bug should be already fixed
in the VCS repo, so an upload would be very welcome.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--
To UNS
On 07-Apr-2009, Noah Slater wrote:
> Thanks, there are still some issues before I upload.
No problem.
> What benefit is there to tagging the bug? Why did you go out of your
> way?
I was looking for ways to help the ‘python-support’ transition, and
saw a bug which looked like it had not been addr
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:49:17PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> I was looking for ways to help the ‘python-support’ transition, and
> saw a bug which looked like it had not been addressed and no
> communication from the maintainer as to what the status was.
>
> So, on discovering that the maintainer
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:08:00PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Since this change is in the Debian VCS repository for the package, and
> appears to address this bug report, I am tagging this report as
> pending a new package upload.
Thanks, there are still some issues before I upload.
What benefit
package phenny
tags 516038 + pending
thanks
On 19-Feb-2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> It should be trivial to use __file__ instead of hard-coding this
> path. This way the modules would be completely relocatable and you
> will avoid any potential issues in the future.
In the declared Subversion r
severity 516038 wishlist
thanks
Le jeudi 19 février 2009 à 00:06 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Package: phenny
> the phenny package uses a hard-coded path to the python modules:
> home = "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/phenny"
> (in bot.py)
>
> However, because of numerous reques
Package: phenny
Version: 2~hg16-1
Severity: important
Hi,
the phenny package uses a hard-coded path to the python modules:
home = "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/phenny"
(in bot.py)
However, because of numerous requests from developers, the installation
path for these modules is going
12 matches
Mail list logo
