Is the netdev group really obsolete? It seems to me that at least
network-manager, wpasupplicant and avahi-daemon rely on it (for
dbus.1/polkit-1). All packages add the group in .postinst.
Like with most of these old groups, the name is not optimal: it does
not really deal with "devices". Only /de
Hi there!
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:43:42 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 26 février 2011 à 17:58 +0100, Luca Capello a écrit :
>> > Sounds clearly like an option; it’s not as if I cared how the group is
>> > created, the only point is that it has to be here.
>>
>> I stumbled upon this b
Le samedi 26 février 2011 à 17:58 +0100, Luca Capello a écrit :
> > Sounds clearly like an option; it’s not as if I cared how the group is
> > created, the only point is that it has to be here.
>
> I stumbled upon this bug while looking for other base-passwd bugs and I
> was surprised this has no
Hi there!
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:01:24 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 14:57 +, Colin Watson a écrit :
>> group.master is a hard thing to change our mind about later, and frankly
>> I have never had the impression that these hardware access groups are
>> terribly st
4 matches
Mail list logo
